<% appTitle="Ridecamp Archives" %> Ridecamp: Re: [RC] [RC] [RC] Hunting Season
Ridecamp@Endurance.Net

[Archives Index]   [Date Index]   [Thread Index]   [Author Index]   [Subject Index]
Current to Wed Jul 23 17:40:02 GMT 2003
  • Next by Date: [RC] hunting season
  • - Deblyons54
  • Prev by Date: [RC] Lowlands PAC Fundraiser
  • - Steph Teeter

    Re: [RC] [RC] [RC] Hunting Season - Lif Strand


    At 12:15 PM 11/17/02, heidi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
    EXCUSE ME???  Here in the West, virtually ALL of the commodities you
    describe are on public lands.  There IS no "somewhere else" to purchase
    these things, for the most part.
    

    I said "in theory". In practice you actually can lease pasture from a private landowner, you could cut trees on someone's private land. Don't know if you could mine on someone's private land - in NM most of the mineral rights are owned by the federal government, might be that way everywhere else. You could even hunt on private hunting preserves as well.


    As a recreational user, the FIRST people I'd like to see
    back in these woods are the loggers!
    

    Yup, I've ridden on many a logging road.


    Please show me where hunters get refunds?  He buys the privilege to hunt
    just like you buy the privilege to ride an endurance ride by paying an
    entry fee.  What's the difference?
    

    I don't know. I'm agreeing with you. Somebody else suggested hunters should get refunds if they couldn't hunt because I said if I couldn't have access to public lands paid for with public money then I should get a tax refund (hah - like I believe the gov't would ever do that!). I absolutely agree that hunters buy the privilege to hunt. But I believe that's because he gets to "harvest" something. Riders paying for an endurance ride are paying for land use too, but plain old everyday recreational use - what's being harvested there? None of these fees mentioned are paying for just walking on the land!


    Personally, wouldn't it make a lot more sense to tighten up your local hunter safety regulations, if they are lacking (states that have them have demonstrably better safety among hunters than those that don't), etc., than to pick on one entire group of the public that also enjoys using public lands--and pays handsomely for the privilege.

    Yes, I agree absolutely that tightening up safety regulations, encouraging the creation of mandatory firearms education, etc. would be the way to go. That's what I've been trying to say - that no one group has more rights than the other, that other users should not have to forego using lands so that one special group can, that a group which causes problems should become educated and encourage themselves to self regulate so that these problems can stop rather than the whole rest of the world working around them to accommodate them! I am NOT arguing any other way!



    _________________________________________________ Lif Strand * Quemado NM USA * www.fasterhorses.com ** You speak, I listen, We talk **


    =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Ridecamp is a service of Endurance Net, http://www.endurance.net. Information, Policy, Disclaimer: http://www.endurance.net/Ridecamp Subscribe/Unsubscribe http://www.endurance.net/ridecamp/logon.asp

    If you are an AERC member - PLEASE VOTE in the Director at Large and By Laws Elections.

    =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=


    Replies
    Re: [RC] [RC] [RC] Hunting Season, Lif Strand
    Re: [RC] [RC] [RC] Hunting Season, Nancy Mitts
    Re: [RC] [RC] [RC] Hunting Season, heidi