<% appTitle="Ridecamp Archives" %> Ridecamp: Re: [RC] RO
Ridecamp@Endurance.Net
[Archives Index]   [Date Index]   [Thread Index]   [Author Index]   [Subject Index]
Current to Wed Jul 23 17:38:47 GMT 2003
  • Next by Date: [RC] Death Valley Encounter- What's it like?
    • - Scott & Dede Johnson
  • Prev by Date: Re: [RC] warning on pipe panels, and question
    • - Bette Lamore

    Re: [RC] RO - Heidi Smith

    Yes, you should have asked the vet to change the card.  The vet did not understand how the pull codes are used.  Even though the horse was deemed "sound enough to continue" by the vet, the reason that made YOU choose to pull was an issue of soundness.  "Rider option" was perhaps poorly named--it should have been something like "rider issue" or "rider incapacity" or something like that.
     
    Heidi
     
    ----- Original Message -----
    From: Sue Brown
    Sent: Saturday, November 09, 2002 5:10 PM
    Subject: Re: [RC] RO

    “RO” is what the vet put on the card.  Are you saying I should have made him change the card?  I believe that this issue is currently being addressed as to what the reason is for the pull -- getting a better definition of the RO pulls.  Yes, it was Rider Option because the vet declared him sound enough to continue.  

    Replies
    Re: [RC] RO, Sue Brown