<% appTitle="Ridecamp Archives" %> Ridecamp: Re: [RC] RO
Ridecamp@Endurance.Net

[Archives Index]   [Date Index]   [Thread Index]   [Author Index]   [Subject Index]
Current to Wed Jul 23 17:38:47 GMT 2003
  • Next by Date: Re: [RC] Trailer accidents/to tie or not
  • - Joe Long
  • Prev by Date: Re: [RC] IAHA ride aka speed?
  • - Truman Prevatt

    Re: [RC] RO - Sue Brown


    Sue replied:

      "We were given the go-ahead from the vet but opted to pull anyway."

     

    terre said:

    Sue, you are missing Bob's point.  The only reason we even HAVE pull codes

    is that we are trying to amass data on "what goes wrong at rides, what

    causes horses to pull".  We don't care who detected the problem, we care

    what the problem was.

     

    *********

    No...I’m not missing Bob’s point.  Take a look at the sentence at the end of the paragraph that was cut when you quoted me.  

     

    **************

    We discussed this with the vet at the ride...he said it wasn’t enough that he would pull him and would still let him go on.. he classified it as a 1+...but I didn’t want to take any chances since I use him for a schooling horse.  What I saw was on the trail and not demonstrated to any degree at the vet check. * **The new RO listings would list it as ROL. ***

     

    **************

    “RO” is what the vet put on the card.  Are you saying I should have made him change the card?  I believe that this issue is currently being addressed as to what the reason is for the pull -- getting a better definition of the RO pulls.  Yes, it was Rider Option because the vet declared him sound enough to continue.  Yes, he was sound enough to continue but would he still be sound after another 30 miles?  We didn’t know and we didn’t want to take the chance.  He had not been categorized as Lame by the vet yet because he wasn’t yet lame by definition.  I personally don’t care if it’s listed as RL-O (Rider Option Lame), altho the vet didn’t see what we saw (or we think we saw) so he couldn’t call it a pull for lameness, except for maybe an odd bobble...not enough for a pull.  

     

    I agree with both sides of the discussion...the info needs to be tracked (which is why they’re working a better way of listing the Rider Option categories)  Until then, the vet did not pull the horse for lameness because it was not a lameness past a 1 when the vet saw him.  The vet said he was “fit to continue” but we said “okay...but we’re still going to pull.”  We could have easily have said that Jim didn’t feel good or something like that and no one would have known that we saw anything on the trail.  But we’re basically pretty honest folks so we discussed it with the vet...who believed what we were saying, said he wasn’t pulling us...it was our choice...and then wrote RO on the card.

     

    End of story.  Flame suit on. <g>

     

    Sue

     

    **************************

     

    "Live as you will have wished to have lived when you are dying."

    - Christian Furchtegott Gellert, German Poet and Writer

    **************************

    Sue Brown

    ARICP Certified Riding Instructor

    Recreational Riding and Dressage

    Tyee Farm

    Marysville, Wa.

    suebrown1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx