<% appTitle="Ridecamp Archives" %> Ridecamp: [RC] The Way We Win

[Archives Index]   [Date Index]   [Thread Index]   [Author Index]   [Subject Index]
Current to Wed Jul 23 17:35:57 GMT 2003
  • Next by Date: Re: [RC] The Way We Win
  • - Heidi Smith
  • Prev by Date: Re: [RC] January 2002 European Chef d'Equipe Resolutions for FEI
  • - Heidi Smith

    [RC] The Way We Win - Roberta Jo Lieberman

    Karen wrote:
    <....and it is never safe to race on a 100. ... If there is no other goal but
    to win, horses will keep dying no matter how strict the vet control is.<
    Matthew wrote:
    >....get us to the place where stewardship
    over time, with the speed entirely at the discretion of the rider, is the reward
    for both superior and elite performance<
    Nobody is proposing to change the sport of endurance -- there are no speed
    limits or rules imposed  -- only the rewards would change. Rewards shape
    behavior. And isn't that what we're trying to change -- the win-at-all-costs
    Think about it in a different light for just a moment.....
    If the federal government, after intense lobbying by animal rights' groups,
    ordered us to come up with changes in 48 hours or *they would do it for us*,
    what plan would you propose?  If it was a choice between NO ENDURANCE at all or
    something that we had a chance to design that arguably would spare the lives of
    horses, what would it be?
    And then consider.....are we having this conversation because we don't want to
    be shut down by PETA....or because it's the right thing to do? What is more
    important to you, personally:  preserving the right of someone (maybe even you)
    to race for the win and all of the attendant risks that involves....
    ...and to revisit Susan G's statement:
    "Part of the problem is that we still don't have a perfect system of
    accurately evaluating horses during vet checks.  We've all seen or heard
    about horses that finished a ride with acceptable vet parameters under good
    vets and yet crashed later that night, or the next day or whatever.  That
    wouldn't be happening if a) they were not significantly metabolically
    stressed (which they are); b) if we had a timely and comprehensive method to
    precisely assess the horse's metabolic status (which we don't) and c) if we
    really understood exactly WHY crashing horses were crashing (which we
    don't).  Hell, we don't even have a really good handle on what all the risk
    factors are, though we're getting better at that."
    ....or the peace in your heart that comes from knowing that you made a
    difference in the lives of thousands of horses? Because it's not just the
    high-profile horses who are lost that are at stake here, but the untold numbers
    of competitiors who experience shortened careers or a premature demise due to
    chronic overriding. Only when stewardship is rewarded over recklessness will the
    balance shift to include *both* members of the team on equal footing.
    We have a chance to be bold here and make history. Endurance riding (and AERC)
    would become known as *the* equine sport that took a stand for its equine
    partners....we could become a model for change in the competitive horse world.
    (I've spoken with dressage and hunter-jumper folks who would leap at the chance
    to make a comparable shift in their sports, which often exact a cruel toll on
    their horses--all in the name of winning.)
    Escondido, Calif.
    AERC #3637
     Ridecamp is a service of Endurance Net, http://www.endurance.net.
     Information, Policy, Disclaimer: http://www.endurance.net/Ridecamp
     Subscribe/Unsubscribe http://www.endurance.net/ridecamp/logon.asp
     If you are an AERC member - PLEASE VOTE in the upcoming By-Laws 
     Election!!!! (it takes 2/3rds to tango!!)