<% appTitle="Ridecamp Archives" %> Ridecamp: Re: [RC] re: Angie and VC's
Ridecamp@Endurance.Net

[Archives Index]   [Date Index]   [Thread Index]   [Author Index]   [Subject Index]
Current to Wed Jul 23 17:35:24 GMT 2003
  • Next by Date: Re: [RC] Other side of the Coin - esp. Scott
  • - Kristene Smuts
  • Prev by Date: Re: [RC] re: Angie and VC's
  • - superpat

    Re: [RC] re: Angie and VC's - Renee Gonzalez


    I don't think its about saving the rider a completion. I think the early vet checks are a good idea because it might save someone from having a sick horse. Why wait til 25 or 30 miles to see that your horse isn't recovering as well as he aughta be when you can see at a 9 mile pulse and go that the horse isn't going to be able to keep up with the front runners....

    Of course, I don't ride very fast or race. In fact, I usually come in closer to dead last. I figure that if there is no way you could be going any slower, then you don't have to wonder if you're going too fast <bg>

    Renee

    <<At 10:10 PM 09/19/2002 -0700, you wrote:
    RM's do not need to make sure that horses get slowed down
    > early so they can get a completion. THATS the RIDERS JOB.  IMHO
    


    =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
    Ridecamp is a service of Endurance Net, http://www.endurance.net.
    Information, Policy, Disclaimer: http://www.endurance.net/Ridecamp
    Subscribe/Unsubscribe http://www.endurance.net/ridecamp/logon.asp

    If you are an AERC member - PLEASE VOTE in the upcoming By-Laws Election!!!! (it takes 2/3rds to tango!!)

    =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=


    Replies
    [RC] re: Angie and VC's, Teresa Van Hove
    Re: [RC] re: Angie and VC's, superpat