<% appTitle="Ridecamp Archives" %> Ridecamp: Re: [RC] Rider size
Ridecamp@Endurance.Net

[Archives Index]   [Date Index]   [Thread Index]   [Author Index]   [Subject Index]
Current to Wed Jul 23 17:34:19 GMT 2003
  • Next by Date: [RC] horse size vs. lameness
  • - Michelle Fink
  • Prev by Date: Re: [RC] carbohydrate fuel
  • - Susan Garlinghouse

    Re: [RC] Rider size - Susan Garlinghouse


    Yup, you're correct, those are the numbers demonstrated by the data from
    mountainous, technical type trails.  Couldn't tell you how the numbers would
    change on very flat rides.  Probably not a whole lot.  Also, the 1100# total
    mass is where lameness starts sloping upward, but doesn't start to *sharply*
    slope upwards until total mass is over about 1200.  Once the total mass went
    over 1300, the lameness accounted for 100% of the pulls---EXCEPT for one
    mule that went top ten and Haggin Cup to boot, just to spite me. :-)  Of
    course, all the horses and riders in the study were within a realistic
    range, too.  No 500 pound horses and 350 pound riders.
    
    Susan G
    
    > I believe that Susan presented some data at one time that stated it is the
    > total combined weight of horse and rider that matters....I don't remember
    > the numbers.  But if I am correct (and Susan please correct me if I'm
    NOT),
    > I think that once the total weight combined surpasses 1100# is when we
    start
    > seeing more lamenesses.  So, it didn't matter if the horse was 850# and
    the
    > rider was 250# or if the horse was 1000# and the rider only 100#.  I
    believe
    > a lot of that discussion also brought up the rider's skills.  Which made
    me
    > feel better.  I see a lot of lightweight riders out there who flop around
    > like fish in the saddle on nice big horses and they go lame or have
    > problems.  They are more of a detriment to their horses than the heavier
    > rider who rides balanced on a smaller horse.  There are a lot of factors
    to
    > consider other than size and weight of horse and rider.  Any comments,
    > Susan?
    > Maggie
    >
    >
    > =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
    >  Ridecamp is a service of Endurance Net, http://www.endurance.net.
    >  Information, Policy, Disclaimer: http://www.endurance.net/Ridecamp
    >  Subscribe/Unsubscribe http://www.endurance.net/ridecamp/logon.asp
    > =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
    >
    >
    
    
    
    =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
     Ridecamp is a service of Endurance Net, http://www.endurance.net.
     Information, Policy, Disclaimer: http://www.endurance.net/Ridecamp
     Subscribe/Unsubscribe http://www.endurance.net/ridecamp/logon.asp
    =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
    
    

    Replies
    [RC] Rider size, Lori Chandler
    Re: [RC] Rider size, Maggie Mieske