Re: [RC] Rider size - Maggie Mieske
I believe that Susan presented some data at one time that stated it is the
total combined weight of horse and rider that matters....I don't remember
the numbers. But if I am correct (and Susan please correct me if I'm NOT),
I think that once the total weight combined surpasses 1100# is when we start
seeing more lamenesses. So, it didn't matter if the horse was 850# and the
rider was 250# or if the horse was 1000# and the rider only 100#. I believe
a lot of that discussion also brought up the rider's skills. Which made me
feel better. I see a lot of lightweight riders out there who flop around
like fish in the saddle on nice big horses and they go lame or have
problems. They are more of a detriment to their horses than the heavier
rider who rides balanced on a smaller horse. There are a lot of factors to
consider other than size and weight of horse and rider. Any comments,
Susan?
Maggie
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Ridecamp is a service of Endurance Net, http://www.endurance.net.
Information, Policy, Disclaimer: http://www.endurance.net/Ridecamp
Subscribe/Unsubscribe http://www.endurance.net/ridecamp/logon.asp
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
- Replies
-
- [RC] Rider size, Lori Chandler
|
|