<% appTitle="Ridecamp Archives" %> Ridecamp: Re: [RC] Rider size
Ridecamp@Endurance.Net

[Archives Index]   [Date Index]   [Thread Index]   [Author Index]   [Subject Index]
Current to Wed Jul 23 17:34:19 GMT 2003
  • Next by Date: Re: [RC] Weight of horse compared to rider
  • - heidi
  • Prev by Date: [RC] Rider size
  • - Lori Chandler

    Re: [RC] Rider size - Maggie Mieske


    I believe that Susan presented some data at one time that stated it is the
    total combined weight of horse and rider that matters....I don't remember
    the numbers.  But if I am correct (and Susan please correct me if I'm NOT),
    I think that once the total weight combined surpasses 1100# is when we start
    seeing more lamenesses.  So, it didn't matter if the horse was 850# and the
    rider was 250# or if the horse was 1000# and the rider only 100#.  I believe
    a lot of that discussion also brought up the rider's skills.  Which made me
    feel better.  I see a lot of lightweight riders out there who flop around
    like fish in the saddle on nice big horses and they go lame or have
    problems.  They are more of a detriment to their horses than the heavier
    rider who rides balanced on a smaller horse.  There are a lot of factors to
    consider other than size and weight of horse and rider.  Any comments,
    Susan?
    Maggie
    
    
    =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
     Ridecamp is a service of Endurance Net, http://www.endurance.net.
     Information, Policy, Disclaimer: http://www.endurance.net/Ridecamp
     Subscribe/Unsubscribe http://www.endurance.net/ridecamp/logon.asp
    =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
    
    

    Replies
    [RC] Rider size, Lori Chandler