<% appTitle="Ridecamp Archives" %> Ridecamp: Re: [RC] Missing shoe
Ridecamp@Endurance.Net

[Archives Index]   [Date Index]   [Thread Index]   [Author Index]   [Subject Index]
Current to Wed Jul 23 17:34:24 GMT 2003
  • Next by Date: Re: [RC] Missing shoe
  • - Maggie Mieske
  • Prev by Date: [RC] Norco Ride: So California
  • - nina bomar

    Re: [RC] Missing shoe - Truman Prevatt


    I was down at the barn a while ago and I weighed my Arab's old rear eventer on my feed scale which is pretty accurate - 3/4 pound (12 oz). I also measured them and a new one is 3/8 inch thick and old one old one (can't be reused) a hair over 1/4 inch thick

    I think you are making the assumption that someone will hack up the foot taking the shoe off. Removing a shoe is pretty stright forward if you have the right tools to remove the clinch and pull the nails and this can be done with no damage to the foot.

    I sure would not one day come out and unbanance the hind feet by putting a 1/4 to 3/8 inch rim pad on one hind foot and go for a long ride. With the thickness of the eventer on one foot that's exactly what you are doing.

    If it were mine, I'd pull the shoe ( if I had the tools and knew how ) and use easy boots to protect boot hind feet on the ride. At a mind I'd put an easy boot on the shoeless foot.

    Truman

    Maggie Mieske wrote:

    Unless they're a HUGE warmblood size 2 or 3, SCE shoes don't weigh anywhere
    near a pound.  An ought maybe weighs 8-10 ounces.  TOPS.  Nelson and I both
    stand by our initial stance that it does NOT hurt for you to ride your horse
    with one shoe on and one shoe off.  Not even 20 miles.  The weight nor the
    length missing should make your horse lame.  If it makes YOU feel better to
    pull the shoe, then do so.  Cindy tells me she is due for a reset next week
    anyway.  However my advice is based on LOTS of experience (most of it
    Nelson's who has been shoeing for about 30 years) and 9 times out of 10, the
    shoe that people try to pull to "match" their horses shoeless foot does more
    damage to the foot than was done to the other foot.  I also told Cindy that
    she knows the terrain better than I and that she would have to make the
    decision for herself.  If it is indeed going to be hard on the horse's feet,
    wouldn't it be better for the farrier to only have to deal with one problem
    foot (if indeed the foot did chip or break up) than TWO?  I offered some
    advice...people have to use what works for them.
    And that's all I got to say about that.
    Have a great weekend everyone.
    Maggie






    =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
    Ridecamp is a service of Endurance Net, http://www.endurance.net.
    Information, Policy, Disclaimer: http://www.endurance.net/Ridecamp
    Subscribe/Unsubscribe http://www.endurance.net/ridecamp/logon.asp
    =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=


    Replies
    Re: [RC] Missing shoe, Truman Prevatt
    Re: [RC] Missing shoe, Maggie Mieske