Ridecamp: Fw: Re: Fw: [RC] More on the ROC

Karen,

You should check the facts before you spread these malicious lies.  There
is absolutely no truth in your statement to ridecamp.  If you have a
"source", they are playing you for a fool by allowing you to spread lies
in public.

Randy Eiland

> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Karen" <karen@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: <ridecamp@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Friday, August 09, 2002 12:17 PM
> Subject: [RC] More on the ROC
> 
> 
> > Well well well, I know the real reason why Randy won't sanction 
> the ROC a
> > week apart and several hundred miles from his own ride.  We should 
> have
> > known there was another reason that none of us knew about.  
> Nevermind that
> > there is a 3 day ride much closer to his ride on that same date in 
> the CT
> > region.  Good thing they are in a different region or that ride 
> would
> never
> > have been allowed to go on.  We did think it odd that he would not 
> allow a
> > ride in the SW region to go a week apart and several hundred miles 
> away
> > from his own ride, one of which had _zero_ entries in the 100 
> miler the
> > year before.
> >
> > It's because he is in the running to host the National 
> Championship
> > ride!  He wants it for *5* years.  You see, he knows that moving 
> the NC
> > ride to the west region is going to be a pretty huge task.  There 
> are
> rides
> > nearly every weekend on the ride calendar already (some weekends 2 
> rides)
> > during the month they want to hold the NC ride.  That along with 
> the fact
> > that nobody is exactly jumping up and down wanting to do it.  They 
> are
> > considering three rides right now for the next NC location -- 
> Swanton, Red
> > Rock (in Reno), and Randy's ride (the one that he is protecting by 
> not
> > allowing the ROC to go).  So even if the West does get it for 2 
> years, he
> > would then get it back and with the demand he has it for 5 
> years--and in
> > the meantime, he has to protect that ride on the calendar in the 
> SW
> region!!
> >
> > And, to top it all off, they are not allowing Susan Gibson to 
> speak at the
> > midyear board meeting. They considered her protest a 'moot point' 
> and kept
> > her $100 even though it is a very obvious conflict of interest.
> >
> > The politics in this organization really suck.
> >
> > Karen Chaton
> > AERC #14149
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > 
> =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
> >  Ridecamp is a service of Endurance Net, 
> http://www.endurance.net.
> >  Information, Policy, Disclaimer: 
> http://www.endurance.net/Ridecamp
> >  Subscribe/Unsubscribe 
> http://www.endurance.net/ridecamp/logon.asp
> > 
> =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
> >
> >
> 
> 

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
 Ridecamp is a service of Endurance Net, http://www.endurance.net.
 Information, Policy, Disclaimer: http://www.endurance.net/Ridecamp
 Subscribe/Unsubscribe http://www.endurance.net/ridecamp/logon.asp
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=