| 
 As a newbie who hasn't even gotten to the trail 
yet, I will agree with you on the general impression that LD'ers are not as 
important as the longer distancers just by the comments that have been made 
since I joined this list a little over a week ago. My whole "happy" attitude 
about once again joining a sport I loved is wavering a little. When I rode 
almost 30 years ago I don't believe there were 25-milers. I think it's a great 
addition for people like me who need a place to start or start again, but are a 
little too chicken to put their horse out there for the first time, not knowing 
how they will do. But I'm a little scared by some of the comments to think I 
might get run over by somebody or get kicked out of of place in the vet line, 
etc. Maybe there should be different vets for the LD'ers? Someone PLEASE 
reassure me that this is still a nice sport with nice people and I'll have a 
good time. I really want to ride again. 
  
Jackie (new/oldbie in California) 
  ----- Original Message -----  
  
  
  Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2002 1:46 
  PM 
  Subject: Re: [RC] LD again 
  
 
  ----- Original Message ----- From: "Steph Teeter" <steph@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Here's 
  my opinion on LD as a BOD member - (but, however) it's not a simple > 
  issue. > There is a whole section of rules pertaining to LD only.  
  And there is a > section/rule which states that there is a minimum 
  completion time.  This > means the stopwatch matters and that 
  Limited Distance, same as for > Endurance, is therefore a race.  
  The only thing differing the two is the > "finish line", which is 
  actually a finish line for endurance, and is meeting > the pulse 
  criteria of 60 for Limited Distance.
  I have a question regarding LD 
  rides.  Is the following ethical?   Scenario: all vet checks 
  and vets in camp.   A Question was asked at ride meeting if 50's 
  would be given priority over 25 in the vet line?  Answer from head 
  vet goes something like, only Best condition horses judging will be 
  given priority....rest should be no problem as all vets are in 
  camp...implication is that 50's will NOT be given priority to 25's in 
  line....as there were pleanty of vets.
  later on, 25 miler going for 
  final vet check after completion (first ride, newbie with green horse who 
  is antsy).  In line for vet check with one horse in front of 
  her.....then a whole group of 50;s come up ( not front runners, OR end of 
  pack, in other words, then had pleanty of time to vet through and finish 
  last loop).  A person who is related to ride managment steps in 
  and inserts all these 50;s in line ahead of about 6 people who have been 
  waiting to vet for completion....then ANOTHER group of 50;s ride up and 
  THEY bump the LD-ers; at his direction.   This goes on at least a 
  half hour.... finishers are waiting in hot sun with impatient and tired 
  horses.....what do you do in a situation like this?
  "Person" who 
  gave priority to 50's claimed no knowledge that 25's were not to be bumped, 
  claimed ride managment told him to do this.....when all ride managment and 
  helpers were at original ride meeting where it was said 50's were NOT to be 
  given priority.....
  Needless to say, newbie to sport was NOT 
  impressed!  Got the distinct impression that 25's were nobodies and 
  50's could break the rules....
  Any comments?
  Karen (personally, 
  as someone who rides LD  and some 50's), I would never think I was 
  more special than an LD-er, when I was on a 50 and push in front of them in 
  line!  Their horses are as important as mine, and MAY 
  be stressed.....
 
  =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=  Ridecamp 
  is a service of Endurance Net, http://www.endurance.net.  Information, 
  Policy, Disclaimer: http://www.endurance.net/Ridecamp  Subscribe/Unsubscribe 
  http://www.endurance.net/ridecamp/logon.asp =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
  
 |