<% appTitle="Ridecamp Archives" %> Ridecamp: RE: [RC] LD again
Ridecamp@Endurance.Net

[Archives Index]   [Date Index]   [Thread Index]   [Author Index]   [Subject Index]
Current to Wed Jul 23 17:28:15 GMT 2003
  • Next by Date: [RC] Ridecamp - are you suddenly getting (or not getting) ridecamp posts?
  • - Steph Teeter
  • Prev by Date: [RC] test post
  • - Nancy Mitts

    RE: [RC] LD again - Steph Teeter


    Karen - to answer your question about who has priority at vetchecks: It's
    fairly common practice to give priority to continuing riders if the
    vetchecks are backed up. Sort of depends on the ride, and on what else is
    happening. It doesn't really matter what distance the rider is doing, but if
    he/she is coming in for a hold and will be continuing, it may be reasonable
    to ask to go ahead of riders who are judging for BC, or waiting for
    completion. It's not the best scenario though, since it can be hard on hot
    horses to stand and wait for a completion exam. And it may make a difference
    in BC judging if a horse is judged after 1 hour, or after 1 1/2 hours. In my
    experience it is rare for a ride manager to mandate one way or the other -
    usually it's something that happens spur-of-the-moment if vet lines get
    backed up. If the lines aren't outrageous, I prefer to have everybody just
    stay in line as they are - or at least ask, rather than demand to bump the
    line.
    
    But - it's not unique to LD riders. Often 50 mile completions are asked to
    wait while the 75's or 100's see the vet so they can start their hold and
    feed their horses - since they'll be going back out again.
    
    Don't take it personally :)
    
    Steph
    
    
    =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
     Ridecamp is a service of Endurance Net, http://www.endurance.net.
     Information, Policy, Disclaimer: http://www.endurance.net/Ridecamp
     Subscribe/Unsubscribe http://www.endurance.net/ridecamp/logon.asp
    =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
    
    

    Replies
    Re: [RC] LD again, Sullivan