<% appTitle="Ridecamp Archives" %> Ridecamp: Re: [RC] Protecting Horses
Ridecamp@Endurance.Net

[Archives Index]   [Date Index]   [Thread Index]   [Author Index]   [Subject Index]
Current to Wed Jul 23 17:28:19 GMT 2003
  • Next by Date: [RC] Protecting Horses / vet checks
  • - Steph Teeter
  • Prev by Date: Re: [RC] [RC] horse uninterested on training rides (LONG)
  • - Mary Sutliff

    Re: [RC] Protecting Horses - Milinda Ellis


    Lynge,
     
    Are you sure large, heavily-muscled breeds are being eliminated by lowering pulse criteria?  Within the last month, I've gone to two rides (here in Texas) where pulse was 60.  At the first one, there were more Arabs not "pulsing down" than the stockier, western types.  I don't recall any treatments being necessary these times, either.  You just have to use your head and know your horse -- no matter what flavor...
     
    Milinda Ellis
    Jewett, Texas
    ----- Original Message -----
    Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 11:57 AM
    Subject: Re: [RC] Protecting Horses

    Steve,

    I loved the days when many other breeds competed in endurance, from the "76 Great American Horse Race" to "Tevis." Today it is only a very few exceptional examples of other breeds.  Yes, the Arab does seem to have what it takes to do endurance best, but as we lower the PR criterior we have been eliminating the heavy muscled breeds.  68 was achievable for healthy, fit big breeds.
    I'm not a vet, of course, but I do realize that we keep our membership lower by eliminating other breeds from participation.  I wonder if a 64 means that a Quarter Horse and an Appy are as recovered as an Arab at 60?

    Lynge

    Replies
    Re: [RC] Protecting Horses, LSimoni197