| Check it Out! |
| [Date Prev] | [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] |
| [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Author Index] | [Subject Index] |
Still no argument from me, here.
K.
-----Original Message-----
From: CMKSAGEHIL@aol.com [mailto:CMKSAGEHIL@aol.com]
Sent: Monday, October 08, 2001 10:55 AM
To: Kathy Mayeda; bigcreekranch@cruzio.com
Cc: ridecamp@endurance.net
Subject: Re: RC: RE: RE: Pull codes
In a message dated Mon, 8 Oct 2001 1:29:57 PM Eastern Daylight Time, "Kathy Mayeda" <Kathy_Mayeda@atce.com> writes:
>I
> totally agree with you. I expected a metabolic to show up on my ride
> record, but it didn't. But as some people have posted a long while ago, a
> ride record may be held against a horse that is for sale or at a high level of
> competition where there is a selection committee.
Most selectors and buyers weren't born yesterday. A series of RO's without a good explanation as to the rider's problems is a red flag that one may not be dealing with a truthful rider. I'd FAR rather see M's or L's on the record, and get an explanation of what the rider has done to figure out and correct the problem.
Heidi
| Check it Out! |