Re: endurance related allegations - discuss on RC or no?

[Deanna German <finishis2win@columbus.rr.com>]

RC,

Oh crap, I'm wrong. The first post in the NASTR thread was not anonymous,
was not accusatory and merely stated that the poster had heard about it and
asked if anyone knew anything. I have no problem with this if people who
were there and saw the events unfold offer observations untainted by
emotion. However, it's been documented how inaccurate eye-witness accounts
are in criminal cases. The mind has a way of clouding the "picture" over
time. So, I still seriously doubt the value of discussing this situation on
RC. What's the point if nothing productive can come of it?

A subsequent post, although signed, offered heresay.... I guess I have just
as much of a problem with that as I do with anonymous posts.

I hold myself up as a prime example of someone who thought they had their
facts straight but really didn't. All I did was accuse someone posting
anonymously.

Deanna (Ohio)