Re: RC: Re: AERC and charges

["Howard Bramhall" <hwb67@msn.com>]

 

 

----- Original Message -----

From: SandyDSA@aol.com

Sent: Wednesday, August 01, 2001 11:34 AM

To: hwb67@msn.com; ridecamp@endurance.net

Subject: Re: RC: Re: AERC and charges

 

In a message dated 8/1/01 8:06:21 AM Pacific Daylight Time, hwb67@msn.com
writes:

My problem lies with the riders, who attend AERC rides, who are not members
of AERC.  During the discussion of the mare who dies at the NASTR ride, I

p.s. don't fool yourselves either - there are some pretty terrible riders who
ARE members and who are not above riding their horses into the ground, as if
they were sports cars or motorcycles or something. So....why is it better if
they are members? To me, that is worse because they SHOULD know.
s

 

Please reread my post.  I think you missed my point.  My point is we can take action against riders who are members of AERC by way of filing a protest against them.  We cannot do this to a non AERC member. The owner of the horse who died at the NASTR ride is not a member of AERC; so, unless someone comes up with another way to make it public, you won't be reading about the incident anywhere but here on Ridecamp.

 

cya,

Howard