Fw: "Let's get it on!" PART TWO OF TWO

["Becky Huffman" <tos@htcomp.net>]

(part two of two)

----- Original Message -----
From: <GrandPaws@cs.com>
Subject: Re: "Let's get it on!" PART TWO OF TWO
> It would be interesting to see medical records of Bill's presumed surgery,
> but any verification of that would be infringing on Doctor/patient
> `privilege`, besides the fact that anyone can have surgery for joint
> problems without having the joints screwed up by a horse accident. SOOOoo,
> let's pick another verifiable statement and again I quote the archives
from
> Bill describing his first win: <snipped> "ride consisted of the following:
> loop #1 - 11.2 miles 30 min hold loop #2 - 14.5 miles 30 min hold loop
#3 -
> 13.1 miles 30 min hold loop #4 - 11.2 miles trail conditions - wet but not
> muddy water was abundant on trails. Trails where combination of fast flat
> areas, deeply wooded forest and several steep, long hills. All trails are
> permently marked with mile markers."
>
> OK---Where is the trail? Again, I quote, " All trails are permently marked
> with mile markers." Anyone should be able to see the mile markers. This
goes
> along with the first part of the verification, ie location of 2 of the 3
> rides mentioned on specific dates.
>
> And one last verifiable fact: the name and number of the lady, the career
> Limited distance rider, who was National Champion a few years back, who
> became disenchanted with AERC and founded another Club. Then once we have
> looked at her AERC Limited Distance Championship record, we can have her
> verify that her club put on the rides on the dates where Bill did so well
on
> his supplemented horse. She can disclose the name of the organization and
a
> contact person to verify not only its existence, but its officers, rules,
> and points or records keeping system. Again, quoted from Bill: " > > There
> is a small local club in far East Texas that puts on its on events.> It> >
> was started last year by people who became disenchanted with AERC due to>
> the> > treatment of the "commoners" by the some of the upper echelon in
> this> region> > of AERC. I found out about it from a friend of ours that
we
> where having> > breakfast with the weekend after the first event that I
did
> not get to> > attend. This lady is one of the founders of the club, she
was
> a career> Limit> > Distance rider who was milage champ a few years ago.
> Their events arerun> > under the same rules that AERC has in place with a
> few variations. " This person's name and number could make her one of the
6
> people who verify the existence of the 2 out of 3 events in which Bill and
> his horse performed so well.
>
> Let me say I congratulate Bill on these outstanding achievements and will
> gladly let ti donate his win money from me to Bill's medical expenses if
we
> see this "adequate proof." In the event that Bill has been enjoying some
fun
> on the internet and these things did not occur, I will gladly pocket my
> winnings, knowing that I have helped some novice endurance riders avoid
> misinformation. I might even donate some to a college student and to AERC
> International.
>
> As a known horse breeder and equine vet practitioner, Heidi can hold the
> money, and view the records and witness information. She can talk to
> witnesses if she is not satisfied with the printed documentation.
>
> To reiterate:
> Providing date and location of 2 events and identity of 6 people,
> specifically including ride management and ride vet, who can verify Bill's
/
> Smokey's performance --- 3 people at two different events.
>
> Courthouse/tax records of farm ownership & location so training trail
could
> be verified.
>
> Name and number of the Limited distance champion founder of the other club
> who put rides on the specified dates. She can be one of the 6 people
above.
> Name of the club and specifics regarding its organization. This would be
> assurance that the event was not a one rider activity.
>
> This sounds simple enough ti-----Like you said, "Let's get it on!"
>
> I have forwarded by wire my money to Heidi in a trust account----waiting
for
> ti's matching funds. I believe we need to confine this to some sort of
time
> frame for production of the wager money, for the production of the written
> documentation and production of any other evidence. Heidi needs a time for
> the investigation of event locations, witness accounts, and forwarding of
> any pertinent records.
>
> Let's say June 5 for the wiring of ti's funds, June 15 for postmark of
> written documentation forwarded to Heidi and courtesy copies should be
> provided to both bettors. July 4 seems appropriate for the conclusion to
be
> published on line with the awarding of funds to occur within the next 3
> business days.
>
> Agreeable ti? Put your money where your mouth is.
>
> Cliff Rutherford
>
>
>
>
>
>  - end - part two of two -
>
>
>
>   >>