Re: RC: Heartrates up to 220]

[tina hicks <tina@liveonthenet.com>]

I thought it was more the size of the horse that didn't matter rather
than the weight - tho size and weight are usually somewhat related I
realize :)

Tina

Tivers@aol.com wrote:
> 
> In a message dated 2/9/00 12:34:51 PM Pacific Standard Time,
> truman.prevatt@netsrq.com writes:
> 
> << But Linda don't you remember all the so called analysis presented on RC
>  from which one could only conclude that "weight doesn't matter"?
> 
>  Truman >>
> 
<snip>  That is, the smaller horses might just do better on the treadmill,
> but when taken out and put under a rider, they did less well (in heartrate
> response to exercise) than the larger horses that they had outperformed on
> the treadmill. Big swing in comparative capabilities.
> 
> ti
> 
>