Re: Re: RE: AERC Elections

["ruprecht" <ruprecht@tidepool.com>]

Thank you Barbara.

Joan
----- Original Message -----
From: <BMcCrary27@aol.com>
To: <ruprecht@tidepool.com>
Cc: <ridecamp@endurance.net>
Sent: Monday, October 09, 2000 5:42 PM
Subject: RC: Re: RE: AERC Elections


> In a message dated 10/09/2000 12:17:31 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
> ruprecht@tidepool.com writes:
>
> << Where do the canidates stand of the sanctioning of Dave Nickelson's
2001
>  ride:  or has it already been sanctioned?
>   >>
>
> Joan, I sanctioned it over two years ago at the AERC convention in
Lexington,
> KY.  I was the sanctioning director in charge of special events
(multi-day)
> when Dave presented me with the applications.  Because it was a new
special
> event, and particularly because it was an unusual one, it had to pass by
> board of directors' vote.  The BOD did pass the sanctioning as eight
five-day
> events.  The only policy that Dave has not followed, and he was one who
was
> quite adamant about this at one time, was the policy of not having two
> muti-day events occurring during the same time frame ANYWHERE within the
USA.
>  His is such an unusual event, and such a great opportunity to see the
entire
> XP trail (as near to the original as possible in this day and age), that
it
> seemed a shame to place any restrictions on it.  It may, or may not,
impact
> other multi-day rides, but I would think that there should be no
restrictions
> placed on OTHER muti-day rides either, just becasue Dave's is happening.
Not
> everyone is going to the 2001 XP ride.  Id' love to do it myself, but I
can't
> picture my husband taking off 2 months from work in order to do so.
>
> Barbara
>
>
> =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
> Ridecamp is a service of Endurance Net, http://www.endurance.net.
> Information, Policy, Disclaimer: http://www.endurance.net/RideCamp
> =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
>