Re: RC: Discrete Inquiry

[SandyDSA@aol.com]

In a message dated 7/9/00 11:51:12 AM Pacific Daylight Time, Tivers writes:

<< udging from your most recent post, you spend a lot of time rolling on the 
floor laughing your ass off. Not what we're looking for, actually. This 
present post is a good example of the kind of shallow thinking we don't want 
to ba associated with in any of our team members. Your applicaton, despite 
its assertions of genuineness, dedication and intelligence, is rejected. 
  >>
Sorry Tom - after numerous years working on track, with track vets, with 
other sport horses, and degreed in Exercise Physiology with concentrations in 
both Sportsmedicine and motor development - thanks but I wouldn't dream of 
working for anyone with such an attitude of superiority.  I can't imagine 
what would make you think my post was an application. TIKES! Not a chance in, 
well, you know.....

In any case, you wouldn't fit in here, either, since a good, healthy, 
well-oiled working environment is most helpful. Don't send anyone who meets 
your specs our way - but DO send the empathetic, intuitive, creative-thinking 
people you reject to us. We like people, not robots.
s