|     Check it Out!     |
| [Date Prev] | [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] |
| [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Author Index] | [Subject Index] |
We talked about this at the central region convention and I think that most people agreed that we would like to see "L" or "M" if the vet pulled the horse and a "RO-L" or "RO-M" if the rider pulled out of consideration for the horse. The only way that a rider should have a "RO" is if the horse passed the vet check and was cleared to go back out and the rider chose not to. I don't know how far you want to break down the "RO"s. I would think "horse injured" would be "L", and "rider injured" would be "RO". Becky Huffman Huffman's Arabians ~ The Original Series ~ http://www.htcomp.net/Huffman/ ----- Original Message ----- From: DreamWeaver <karen@chaton.gardnerville.nv.us>> I think that they need to have more options. Right now we have RO = rider > option, L = lame, M = metabolic and I guess there is also OT = over > time. Are there more? There should at least be RI = rider injured or HI = > horse injured. I just think that RO is far too vague. I think that RO > should be used for when the rider wants to pull because something
|     Check it Out!     |