Re: Lynette's Negative Post

[Mia Nalias <arabs2go@yahoo.com>]

First of all, Gay/John's post was referring to a rice bran discussion,
not Lynette's post. 
Second of all, Lynnette has now apologized twice and banished herself
from ridecamp for a while. I think its time to stop bashing her
publicly, which BTW is breaking Steph's rule for using a person's name
in negative posts.
No offence to you intended, just time to move on. IMHO, those that
have bashed Lynette following her apologies actually owe HER one.
Mia


Cheryl Newbanks <horsetrails@inficad.com> wrote:
>
> On Thursday, January 14, 1999 9:46 AM, John J Lykes 
> [SMTP:SEEINGSPOTS@prodigy.net] wrote:
> > Whether or not the advice given is ''hogwash'' or ''excellent 
> information''
> > depends on whether  or not you agree with said advice.  Obviously,
if you
> > agree, then the writer is a genius, and if you disagree, then they
must 
> be
> > total maroooons.  Let's not be accused of keeping an open mind or
trying 
> to
> > learn from others.  Gay
> >
> >
> >
> 
> Good point!  My problem with Lynnette wasn't the post, I started to
read 
> the post and deleted it when she set the tone of it, but the fact
that she 
> then posted back the infamous What? did I do that reply to the
flames she 
> probably got.  Now in my opinion if you are going to post a
antagonizing 
> post you'd better be prepared to buck up and accept the fall out.  If 
> you're going to be an A__hole then be a proud one!
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>                                   Cheryl Newbanks
> ~~~          ~~  ^ ^        SW Region
> ~~~\      _~~/  /\ /        Buckeye, AZ
>        (   ) _ _   ) ' '        horsetrails@inficad.com
>        / /          \ \
>       / /            \ \
>      * *             * *
> 
> 
> 
> 
_________________________________________________________
DO YOU YAHOO!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com