| 
  
   | 
       Check it Out!      
   | 
  
   | 
 
 	
  RideCamp@endurance.net
[Date Prev]  [Date Next]  
[Thread Prev]  [Thread Next]  [Date Index]  [Thread Index]  [Author Index]  [Subject Index]
Re: Big bone vs small bone
To make your point though you won't be able to use your youngsters.
You'll have to take an unfit 8 or 9 yo and measure before and after
conditioning. Our guys put on half a hand and thickened up
considerable in their 5th year. By which time most of us are doing
plenty of LSD.
---CMKSAGEHIL@aol.com wrote:
>
> In a message dated 98-06-26 01:07:10 EDT, niccolai_m@yahoo.com writes:
> 
> << The
>  dimensions you give indicate a circumferential measurment which would
>  include tendons. It is possible that the increase in measurement is
>  due to the strengthening by increase in tendon diameter rather than
>  bone diameter. A better measure of bone size would be to use calipers
>  to measure the width of the bone. >>
> 
> Yes, this measurement does include tendons, and likely has a
contributory
> factor from both increase mass of the soft tissues as well as
increase in the
> actual bone.  The calipers are a good idea--will have to wait for
another
> generation to grow up and go to work, I guess.  I DO think that the
bone has
> increased, though--it certainly looks different visually, and I have
felt that
> I have observed this in other older endurance horses, too.  Will
take your
> suggestion on the calipers, though, and start measuring my youngsters.
> 
> Heidi
> 
> 
==
Nicco Murphy - Poway, San Diego, CA
_________________________________________________________
DO YOU YAHOO!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
  
  
 
  | 
  
   | 
       Check it Out!      
   | 
  
   | 
 
  
    Home
    
  
    Events
    
  
    Groups
    
  
    Rider Directory
    
  
    Market
    
  
    RideCamp
    
  
    Stuff
  
Back to TOC