Re: Leg length

[rides2far@juno.com (Angela C. McGhee)]

Duuuuu, which would you rather take on a trail ride? Your doberman or
your dachsund?

"Relative to body length"...wouldn't shorter legs mean longer back? 
That's a no no.

I'm like Goldilocks...I like'em "Just Right".  Not too long, not to
short, all things in moderation...and you end up like me: middle of the
pack.

Angie

On Thu, 5 Mar 1998 21:26:16 -0800 "Duncan Fletcher" <dfletche@gte.net>
writes:
>The follow question was recently posted on rec.equestrian and appears 
>to
>have generated some rather simplistic answers. Any one care to 
>comment.
>
>> In general, which is more desireable (and why)  for an endurance 
>horse,
>> relative to body length and height.... longer or shorter legs?
>>
>
>Duncan Fletcher
>dfletche@gte.net
>
>
>
>

_____________________________________________________________________
You don't need to buy Internet access to use free Internet e-mail.
Get completely free e-mail from Juno at http://www.juno.com
Or call Juno at (800) 654-JUNO [654-5866]