Mail Delivery Subsystem <MAILER-DAEMON@net.com>: Returned mail: User unknown

[valsharpe@juno.com (Valerie K Sharpe)]

--------- Begin forwarded message ----------
From: Mail Delivery Subsystem <MAILER-DAEMON@net.com>
To: <valsharpe@juno.com>
Subject: Returned mail: User unknown
Date: Tue, 20 Jan 1998 23:41:51 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <199801210741.XAA18550@ns1.net.com>

This is a MIME-encapsulated message

--XAA18550.885368511/ns1.net.com

The original message was received at Tue, 20 Jan 1998 23:41:49 -0800
(PST)
from m17.boston.juno.com [205.231.100.191]

   ----- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -----
<ridecamp@net.com>
    (expanded from: <ridecamp@net.com>)

   ----- Transcript of session follows -----
... while talking to unet.net.com.:
>>> RCPT To:<ridecamp@unet.net.com>
<<< 550 <ridecamp@unet.net.com>... User unknown
550 <ridecamp@net.com>... User unknown

--XAA18550.885368511/ns1.net.com
Content-Type: message/delivery-status

Reporting-MTA: dns; ns1.net.com
Received-From-MTA: dns; m17.boston.juno.com
Arrival-Date: Tue, 20 Jan 1998 23:41:49 -0800 (PST)

Final-Recipient: rfc822; <ridecamp@net.com>
X-Actual-Recipient: rfc822; ridecamp@unet.net.com
Action: failed
Status: 5.1.1
Remote-MTA: dns; unet.net.com
Diagnostic-Code: smtp; 550 <ridecamp@unet.net.com>... User unknown
Last-Attempt-Date: Tue, 20 Jan 1998 23:41:51 -0800 (PST)

--XAA18550.885368511/ns1.net.com
Content-Type: message/rfc822

Return-Path: valsharpe@juno.com
Received: from m17.boston.juno.com (m17.boston.juno.com
[205.231.100.191]) by ns1.net.com (8.8.6/8.6.9) with ESMTP id XAA18548
for <ridecamp@net.com>; Tue, 20 Jan 1998 23:41:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from valsharpe@juno.com)
 by m17.boston.juno.com (queuemail) id CbO10247; Wed, 21 Jan 1998
02:40:05 EST
To: ridecamp@net.com
Date: Wed, 21 Jan 1998 01:49:11 -0500
Subject: Saddles and Stick Shifts is automatic
Message-ID: <19980121.024224.3142.2.ValSharpe@juno.com>
X-Mailer: Juno 1.38
X-Juno-Line-Breaks: 2-3,15-16,25-26,42-45
From: valsharpe@juno.com (Valerie K Sharpe)

I'm fairly new and I have missed bits and pieces to many of your letters;
however, I would like to comment on two things and then also ask a
question of my own.

With regards to "Stick Shifts vs automatic" (again I may have missed a
little here) Usually your Automatics will pull loads better than a stick
but that doesn't matter as much as the "torque".  I had a 1995 Ford F350
Diesel Power Stroke dually.  It was a 5-speed stick.  I traded it in this
past July on a 97 Ford F250 Diesel Power Stroke 4x4.  It pulls with just
as much power as my older F350.  The reason...the F350 loses some torque
in the standard 5-speed and it ends up having the same torque as the F250
automatic.  Also another tip... An auto macanic told me that if you are
not pulling a load and you step on the gas it's the horsepower that
responds and make you go faster but if you are pulling a heavy load and
you step on the gas it is the torque that takes over to pull your load up
to speed.

In response to someones inquiry about what types of saddles everyone is
riding in.  I use an Australian Stock Saddle - Champion VS.  I love it
and I have owed it for almost 3 years.  I bought it new from the
Australian Stock Saddle Company in Malibu, CA.  I went there and was
fitted but you can order over the phone or out of their catalog.  They
also run a small Ad in the back of some of the horse related magazines. 
Not only is this saddle the most comfortable saddle I have ever ridden in
but it is a saddle that I completely trust out in the Arizona Desert
where I train. I feel almost locked into it in a sticky situation.

QUESTION:  Has anyone had any problems with the orthoflex saddles?  I
bought a used one that is an original model #1 version.  It has sored up
every one of my horses, all of which are Arabs.  When my husband rode
behind me once on a trail ride he said that he can see the back of the
saddle moving around in a circular motion and it leaves a saddle sore in
the same spot every time on every horse.  I called the orthoflex company
and they said the #2 version is improved and will not sore the horse but
when I asked if they would stand behind their product and give a full
refund if I have problems with the saddle soring the horses they said no
that I have to deal with the retailer.  The two main retailers of the
saddle told me no they will not take the saddle back if it's been used. 
The reason I ask is because I saw a beautiful new orthoflex elite but do
not want to put out the expense only to have it sore my horses back.  Any
input would be greatly appreciated.  Please send comments to:
ApacheMoon@juno.com and please cc: to ridecamp to benefit everyone.
Thanks.

Valerie 
Phoenix, Arizona   

--XAA18550.885368511/ns1.net.com--


--------- End forwarded message ----------