ridecamp@endurance.net: Re: [endurance] Re: Rider weight

Re: [endurance] Re: Rider weight

Linda VanCeylon (LVanCeylon@vines.ColoState.EDU)
Wed, 27 Mar 96 8:28:45 MST

Stick with your Morgans, they are tougher and have more endurance than a
Quarter Horse or Thorobred. Plus, they are short-backed enough to carry a
heavyweight rider.

I ride Arabs but I'm a short light-weight.

Linda Van Ceylon
lvanceylon@vines.colostate.edu
phone: 970-491-1428
-------------
Original Text
>From "Mark A. Thayer" <mathayer@cs.unm.edu>, on 3/27/96 1:19 AM:
To: endurance@moscow.com

A lurker de-lurks...

This is an interesting -- and important -- thread for me. I'm a big guy
(6'8", 240lbs) and I'm beginning to think about my next horse. The
question of breed/size is more than just an academic exercise.

I've done my competition thing; I ride now strictly for my own enjoyment
and do a little of everything. But I enjoy extended trail riding the most.

So -- does size and/or breed make a difference in what a horse can
comfortably carry for a long time? I like Morgans (I was lucky to find a
very good mare that sticks just around 16h, but she's gettin' on...) but
I'm not obsessed with them. I'd really appreciate some opinions.

Thanks!

Best regards,

Mark Thayer
Albuquerque, New Mexico
USA