<% appTitle="Ridecamp Archives" %> Ridecamp: Re: [RC] RO/Newbie perspective
Ridecamp@Endurance.Net

[Archives Index]   [Date Index]   [Thread Index]   [Author Index]   [Subject Index]
Current to Wed Jul 23 17:39:28 GMT 2003
  • Next by Date: [RC] Ft Howe or ANY fast race
  • - John & Sue Greenall
  • Prev by Date: RE: [RC] RO/Newbie perspective
  • - Roy Drinnan

    Re: [RC] RO/Newbie perspective - Jon . Linderman


    Perhaps it is adviseable to have a RO/HF pull code.  Rider Option/Husband's
    Fault.  This catch-all term could be useful is so many instances.  For
    example, when the husband is the rider and either he or his horse can't
    continue the wife/life mate/significant other/could use the RO/HF to save
    some dignity, or when hubbie is the crew and screws up: forgetting beet
    pulp, electrolytes, clothing, etc., anyopne being crewed for by the husband
    could use the RO/HF if appropriate.  I could have used a RO/HF last year in
    my horse's first year when I let him go too hard and it was not wise for
    him to continue.  Since I as the husband was riding, and did that job
    poorly I might add, the horse should be given the benefit of the doubt with
    a RO/HF.  In fact, I am not sure if there aren't many many other uses for
    RO/HF.  I know both my present and ex-wife use the term liberally on a
    regular basis.
    
    
    Jon K. Linderman
    
    
    
    =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
     Ridecamp is a service of Endurance Net, http://www.endurance.net.
     Information, Policy, Disclaimer: http://www.endurance.net/Ridecamp
     Subscribe/Unsubscribe http://www.endurance.net/ridecamp/logon.asp
    
     If you are an AERC member - PLEASE VOTE in the Director at Large 
     and By Laws Elections.
    
    =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=