<% appTitle="Ridecamp Archives" %> Ridecamp: Re: [RC] Flames and motifvation
Ridecamp@Endurance.Net

[Archives Index]   [Date Index]   [Thread Index]   [Author Index]   [Subject Index]
Current to Wed Jul 23 17:37:38 GMT 2003
  • Next by Date: Re: [RC] Very SHORT riders in AERC rides
  • - AprJhn
  • Prev by Date: [RC] Endurance prospect?
  • - RhndLev

    Re: [RC] Flames and motifvation - Truman Prevatt


    Joe,

    This goes back to the political tactic "if you can't attack the message you attack the messenger." Given the service you have given to the AERC ( not to mention SERA ) it is sad to see the hostility toward you because of your legitimate concern for the welfare of children in our sport. .

    Truman

    Joe Long wrote:

    Yes, I said I wasn't going to post any more on the minimum age
    question, but this isn't another pro-or-con argument but some
    observations about civility in discussions, and a possible alternate
    route to take.






    =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
    Ridecamp is a service of Endurance Net, http://www.endurance.net.
    Information, Policy, Disclaimer: http://www.endurance.net/Ridecamp
    Subscribe/Unsubscribe http://www.endurance.net/ridecamp/logon.asp

    If you are an AERC member - PLEASE VOTE in the upcoming By-Laws Election!!!! (it takes 2/3rds to tango!!)

    =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=


    Replies
    [RC] Flames and motifvation, Joe Long