<% appTitle="Ridecamp Archives" %> Ridecamp: Re: [RC] [RC] FYI
Ridecamp@Endurance.Net

[Archives Index]   [Date Index]   [Thread Index]   [Author Index]   [Subject Index]
Current to Wed Jul 23 17:30:53 GMT 2003
  • Next by Date: Re: [RC] FYI
  • - Colleen Egleston
  • Prev by Date: Re: [RC] Moonlight in VT
  • - Merryben

    Re: [RC] [RC] FYI - SandyDSA


    In a message dated 7/24/2002 4:48:47 AM Pacific Standard Time, plasmatica@xxxxxxxxxxx writes:


    It has both plusses and minuses...

    Plus:  Rare bloodlines can get saved faster...  I can see where this could
    really help the BLUE STARs, being extremely rare



    and I think we have to be careful and nto assume that simply becasue somethign is RARE that it is GOOD, as we learned from some top lined SE horses who sported clubby feet, pencil necks and bad dispositions.

    Minus:  Fads get spread faster, what ever mare wins at Nationals will have
    as many foals for the next couple of years as possible, regardless of her
    actual merits other than being "a living work of art"


    yes, and too many people think that this season's halter champion is quality - well, it might be, but what KIND of quality? As my hsuabnd says at times - yes, they have a LOT of class - and it is all low.

    Plus:  A truly exceptional mare can make a greater contribution to the
    breed, perforance mares can keep up a demanding schedule and still make
    contributions
    Minus:  Potential lack of diversity, barn-blindness will run rampant
    barn blindness is rampant now, as is ignorance and greed. Scary combo.



    For small sport/performance breeders (like me) this ruling would have no
    effect what so ever, other than to get to see lots more "cloned" giraffes in
    the show ring.



    ROFL! Agreed!
    s