<% appTitle="Ridecamp Archives" %> Ridecamp: Re: [RC] AERC and LD
Ridecamp@Endurance.Net

[Archives Index]   [Date Index]   [Thread Index]   [Author Index]   [Subject Index]
Current to Wed Jul 23 17:29:49 GMT 2003
  • Next by Date: [RC] Vermont
  • - Sandy Terp
  • Prev by Date: Re: [RC] AERC and LD
  • - superpat

    Re: [RC] AERC and LD - Heidi Smith


    > I may be mistaken, Rob, but I think the concern of many is that it is the
    > horse who does not get to choose how fast the ride is ridden and if that
    > horse is  (as is often the case with first time yahoos) not properly
    > conditioned for what is asked of him/her, it is the horse who will spend
    the
    > night with an IV hanging from a tree (or worse).
    
    This used to be a significant problem.  However, AERC made two major changes
    that have really changed the nature of LD, and have eliminated a great deal
    of the problem.  1) They changed LD finishes so that the clock doesn't stop
    until the pulse is down.  2)  They took rides of less than 50 miles out of
    the point structure, and created the separate LD system.  In addition to
    those specific changes to LD, ALL distances also have the fit-to-continue
    concept in place.
    
    In the "good old days" one of the things that was not so good was that all
    distances were counted for points (prior to the defining of "endurance" as
    50 miles and more).  I can still remember seeing a 25-miler won in 1:09,
    when they still counted for points, when there was no fit-to-continue, and
    when the clock stopped when you crossed the line.  The day was hot, and I
    seriously wondered if the horse would make it home alive.  This was a
    sufficiently common scenario "back then" that it was closely studied by
    AERC, changes were made, and the abuses were drastically reduced.
    
    Given our present LD structure, I really don't worry about the LD's being
    abusive--there are individual riders who are abusive, but our rules give us
    sufficient leverage to come to the aid of the horse.  I could be wrong, but
    at this point, I don't think we see serious treatments needed on LD's any
    mroe than on any other distance, and most are because something went
    undetected, not because the rider abused the horse by overracing.  Most
    rides, it seems like the LD winning time is slower than the fast 50's run
    the first half of the ride.
    
    Heidi
    
    
    =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
     Ridecamp is a service of Endurance Net, http://www.endurance.net.
     Information, Policy, Disclaimer: http://www.endurance.net/Ridecamp
     Subscribe/Unsubscribe http://www.endurance.net/ridecamp/logon.asp
    =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
    
    

    Replies
    Re: [RC] AERC and LD, Laurie Durgin
    Re: [RC] AERC and LD, Rob
    Re: [RC] AERC and LD, superpat