Re: [RC]   [RC] [RC] protecting horses - Heidi Smith
 
> Thanks Linda,
> I know that's been the take on the rule up here too. Is Central Region the
> only one looking at it that way?
The rule requiring a veterinarian at all checks was intended to cover even
stop-and-go pulse checks when it was put in place by the BoD.  I was on the
BoD at the time, and the discussion was quite specific.  So yes, Vonita was
correct in the situation that was mentioned in saying that to have such a
check is in violation of AERC rules.  (I'm not offering argument pro or con
here--just stating that that's what the rule is.)
Heidi
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
 Ridecamp is a service of Endurance Net, http://www.endurance.net.
 Information, Policy, Disclaimer: http://www.endurance.net/Ridecamp
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
 
 
- Replies
- 
  - Re: [RC]   [RC] [RC] protecting horses, Nancy Mitts
 
 
 
 | 
 
 
 |