<% appTitle="Ridecamp Archives" %> Ridecamp: RE: [RC] Protecting Horses / vet checks
Ridecamp@Endurance.Net

[Archives Index]   [Date Index]   [Thread Index]   [Author Index]   [Subject Index]
Current to Wed Jul 23 17:28:19 GMT 2003
  • Next by Date: Re: [RC] OD's 6th in the 50 was in meat pen 6 wks ago?
  • - Sundaez
  • Prev by Date: RE: [RC] Protecting Horses
  • - Alison Farrin

    RE: [RC] Protecting Horses / vet checks - John Teeter


    At 12:35 PM 6/18/2002, Bob Morris wrote:
    If a time limit is imposed I see the argument could be that the P&R person is declaring the horse unfit to continue and in that is performing a diagnostic function reserved to licensed veterinarians.

    What you say is correct if there is an imposed time limit to meet some criteria and a Disqualification is possible. That would be a veterinary control function.


    But what about if you had a criteria w/o time limit and/or possibility of DQ? If there is no possibilit of DQ, then veterinary control argument becomes pretty weak.

    johnt

    (granted, w/o a time limit, there is the possiblity that the hold might cause an over-time DQ to happen later.)



    =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
    Ridecamp is a service of Endurance Net, http://www.endurance.net.
    Information, Policy, Disclaimer: http://www.endurance.net/Ridecamp
    =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=


    Replies
    [RC] Protecting Horses / vet checks, Steph Teeter
    RE: [RC] Protecting Horses / vet checks, Bob Morris