<% appTitle="Ridecamp Archives" %> Ridecamp: Re: [RC] Equine ration balancing software
Ridecamp@Endurance.Net

[Archives Index]   [Date Index]   [Thread Index]   [Author Index]   [Subject Index]
Current to Wed Jul 23 17:28:22 GMT 2003
  • Next by Date: Re: [RC] Your Ride History/Pulls
  • - Barbara McCrary
  • Prev by Date: Re: [RC] A Killer Pen Success Story
  • - Karen J. Zelinsky

    Re: [RC] Equine ration balancing software - Lisa Redmond


    > Spreadsheets are great things for balancing rations, I use them all the
    time
    > and I guarantee Lisa does too with her cattle work.  However, you have to
    > just be aware that a lot of these programs (though not all, by any means)
    > are still using 1989 NRC recommendations, which have been updated quite a
    > bit in various areas (ie, copper, zinc, calcium, assorted vitamins) but
    not
    > published in one place---you just sortof have to pick up the new values
    here
    > and there in the journals as they're presented.  Two, be aware that alot
    of
    > the NRC values aren't actually conclusions from studies done in horses.
    > Many are extrapolated from other species, and so are rough estimates at
    > best.  Most spreadsheets will give you minimum values, but don't account
    for
    > possible benefits derived by increased levels (and you have to be careful
    > which are potentially beneficial when increased, which benign and which
    > potentially harmful).  And finally, you have to be aware of wide ranges of
    > nutrient values in different feeds grown in different areas and under
    > different conditions---ie, bermuda grown as an afterthought in Florida is
    a
    > fur cry from bermuda grown in say, Kentucky.  So unless you get your feed
    > analyzed and know the exact values (which even then are just
    representative
    > averages for that batch), just remember that NRC book values are rough
    > estimates as well.
    >
    > Having said all that, spreadsheets are really handy things to have around,
    > and a bunch of fun to play with.  And eighty bucks is a good price,
    > reasonable for someone that just wants to keep an eye on their own ration
    > and look for glaring problems.
    >
    > Have fun with it!  :-)
    >
    > Susan G
    >
    
    I'm adding this to the bottom of Susan's, so everyone can have both answers
    in one place if they like.  A good program, if it's still using 1989 values,
    should have the option to make changes to the required amounts (Spartan for
    dairy cattle does, so I'm assuming that the horse version does as well).
    The key to that is getting the values from the correct table to insert.
    They should allow you to save your values, without wiping out the default
    values in some way.
    
    Also, the main thing to remember about ration programs is that they all
    assume the user has some background in formulation--i.e., that you
    understand the basic steps in formulation, how to estimate dry matter intake
    for your animal, what order to input feeds in, that sort of thing.  I'm sure
    Susan experienced this with her students, but I know that when I was
    teaching feeds and feeding, students grasped the mechanics of the program
    but were really clueless when it came to selecting feeds and actually
    designing their own rations.  Not surprising, most of them went for any
    byproduct from the brewing and distilling industries!  The rations would
    balance perfectly, and be completely unsuitable for feeding.
    
    Personally, I usually don't use the automatic formulation commands, and
    balance my rations myself--I just let the computer do the math.  In other
    words, I still add ingredients in the same order I would add them on paper.
    If I get a chance this week, I'll see if there is a demo out there that can
    be downloaded--I want to start collecting and assessing some horse ration
    programs anyway.
    
    As Susan pointed out, some of the values from the charts are extrapolations
    from other species, and while it's reasonable to extrapolate from cattle to
    sheep or vice versa, extrapolating from cattle to horses isn't always
    effective.  Also, NRC recommendations are basically nutrition by committee,
    so what goes into the NRC books can be influenced by the composition of the
    committee, even if they don't mean to unduly influence the tables.  Bottom
    line--use the formulation as a guide, then use your own judgment whether or
    not the ration is doing the job.  As the old Arabian proverb goes "The eye
    of the master fattens his cattle."  NRC values are meant to be used as
    guidelines, not absolutes, but they are great starting points.
    
    Lisa
    
    
    =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
     Ridecamp is a service of Endurance Net, http://www.endurance.net.
     Information, Policy, Disclaimer: http://www.endurance.net/Ridecamp
    =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=