<% appTitle="Ridecamp Archives" %> Ridecamp: RE: Re[2]: [RC] Pre-Ride VC Issues and a few others
Ridecamp@Endurance.Net

[Archives Index]   [Date Index]   [Thread Index]   [Author Index]   [Subject Index]
Current to Wed Jul 23 17:27:27 GMT 2003
  • Next by Date: Re: [RC] terrorist
  • - Howard Bramhall
  • Prev by Date: Re: [RC] Spooky Legs
  • - Laney Humphrey

    RE: Re[2]: [RC] Pre-Ride VC Issues and a few others - Bob Morris


    Well Roger, you are sounding like me now. Not sure that is
    very good. I have the same feelings that you have even
    though I do not always agree with everything you have to
    say. Trying to get any response from the membership is a
    tough thing to do. We went to the trouble to get a
    comparison of the old and new by-laws on line and I do not
    believe we had a half dozen comments about them. People do
    not seem to care.
    
    I believe that the problem with the Board is they do not
    want to seem partial one way or the other. They do not want
    to stand out in a crowd so to say. I guess they do not have
    very much conviction when it comes to AERC matters. I have
    written many posts to the Board and never had but one or two
    comments back. The Board is just not available for debate.
    We never have any concept as to how the Board feels on any
    matters. The membership needs leadership and it just does
    not come from the Board of Directors in any way shape or
    form.
    
    As you are aware, I stand behind everything I post and am
    ready to defend my positions with facts, data and/or proof.
    How many of the Board are willing to make that stand and
    come forward to comment?
    
    Bob
    
    Bob Morris
    Morris Endurance Enterprises
    Boise, ID
    
    -----Original Message-----
    From: ridecamp-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
    [mailto:ridecamp-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Roger
    Rittenhouse
    Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 8:53 PM
    To: ridecamp
    Subject: Re[2]: [RC] Pre-Ride VC Issues and a few others
    
    
    
       While I  am on a roll;
    I stepped up to register my disagreement with a policy and
    protocol I
    believe to be incorrect.   Not the first time nor the last..
    
    While all have the opinions and options to disagree with
    with me or
    agree. ..
    One thing I ask- take the issues public. I really dont need
    trash mail
    or flame mail in private. If you want to take me out or on -
    do it in public,
    
    I also would really like for those who agree with me in
    private to go
    public.
    Standing out alone is not a good place to be if it appears
    no one
    supports you position.
    I have received a few supporting my comments and a few not
    in
    support.. all private  -except Bob M - Howard sort of? and I
    am sure a few others by now.
    
    The only way issues get resolved is to go public  put the
    comments in
    public view for riders and others to read. The BOD will
    eventually
    have to deal with some of these issues as well as other
    issues.
    
    If you disagree with me, say so, if you dont like my style
    say so -
    I dont really care -  just do something. Far too many sit on
    there on  what
    ever and dont speak up   let it all hang out - tell it the
    way YOU see
    it.
    
    I under stand a few are concerned with image and assorted
    positions
    and surely dont want to get caught in a mix with me Howard
    Bob M or
    BOD members or who ever enters in to this, (more will enter
    into the
    fray.)
    
    But sitting there doing nothing is acceptance of the way
    things are
    with out regard to the sport.
    Let the other guy do it.  OR you concur.
    The current membership is quite apathetic as is many on  the
    AERC Board. I have
    taken issues to the BOD list without ONE comment from
    anyone, just
    ignore the loose cannon.  Issues of non- importance are
    covered but dont
    talk about hot items...
    
    What the hell is there to be concerned with here. ITS A
    SPORT! it sure
    is NOT my religion.
    What will happen  well lets see - I will loose business  -
    maybe - its
    the risk I took when I took the job - did anyone think I
    would just
    roll over and go along with the flow.??  Dont care for my
    politics
    and chose not to do business with me . OK then. they really
    are not
    connected.. no business equals no support??
    
    I will continue to speak MY position on issues I believe are
    important. And they are that - just mine.
    lets here yours?
    However- A few others are speaking up.
    
    Next another reason to NOT make waves is retaliation. By
    WHO?  A vet
    who I piss off might pull me? So?? I dont go to rides with
    that vet?
    
    I really dont HAVE to do this, I dropped out of NATRC
    because the BS
    in this region got too much for me and Carol to deal with.
    So we just
    quit- I dont miss it either.
    Problem is AERC sure is NOT NATRC, it has been my life for
    25 plus
    years.
    When I see the sport changing from what I thought it was or
    how it
    was, I register  strong objections. Assign that to
    paternalistic
    emotions.
    If those coming into the sport
    want a different set of rules and principles - then make it
    happen.
    
    I already did deal with the FEI issues. I am not so sure it
    has been good
    for AERC. Others think we should get  more involved. Just
    look at the
    latest EN - 3 articles all about FEI and UAE and how we
    should or
    should not work with them and fit in.
    
    The President  the VP and  a noted vet/rider.  I thought
    there was
    adequate coverage of FEI/UAE related issues in that issue,
    saturation,
    I called it. I just do not see my continued association with
    that
    form of the sport as related to what I believe defines AERC.
    
       AERC has larger issues then FEI/UAE  There is far too
    much
    influence on AERC from FEI already  and I am not alone with
    that
    opinion..
    
    One issue facing YOU the riders is the new BYLAWS. I did
    vote for them
    - no they are not perfect and will be changed years from
    now, but they
    are sound enough to provide for the business of AERC Inc
    
    I wanted a few changes  minor - did not get them - but over
    all the
    bylaws are good and needed to bring the corporation up to
    date and in
    compliance with the Corp Code of Ca.
    I urge you to vote for them.
    
    I may take the time to address a few point later- after this
    fire
    storm passes.
    
    (Sure hope Bobbie R and RMTC escaped the  real firestorm)
      Roger R
    
    
    
    =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
    =-=-=-=-=
     Ridecamp is a service of Endurance Net,
    http://www.endurance.net.
     Information, Policy, Disclaimer:
    http://www.endurance.net/Ridecamp
    =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
    =-=-=-=-=
    
    
    
    =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
     Ridecamp is a service of Endurance Net, http://www.endurance.net.
     Information, Policy, Disclaimer: http://www.endurance.net/Ridecamp
    =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
    
    

    Replies
    Re[2]: [RC] Pre-Ride VC Issues and a few others, Roger Rittenhouse