<% appTitle="Ridecamp Archives" %> Ridecamp: [RC] Pre-Ride VC Issues and a few others
Ridecamp@Endurance.Net

[Archives Index]   [Date Index]   [Thread Index]   [Author Index]   [Subject Index]
Current to Wed Jul 23 17:27:27 GMT 2003
  • Next by Date: Re: [RC] refunds-OD
  • - TddWil
  • Prev by Date: [RC] Spooky Legs
  • - Jerry & Susan Milam

    [RC] Pre-Ride VC Issues and a few others - Hickory Ridge Arabians


    Roger,
    Here is an answer to some of your concerns and thoughts.
    
    <Let me toss this one out - Does anyone other then ME think all this
    <excessive picky nondescript vetting have anything to do with the 
    <influence of FEI and a transference of mind sets from the FEI vets?
    
    
    Roger,
    On the above question, I don't think this is the case.  I don't see 
    vetting any more difficult now than 20 years ago.  What has changed 
    is the relationship between the vets and the riders. Today there 
    seems to be a team approach to any potential problem. The vets are 
    asking to us to work with them in the evaluation of the horse when 
    presented.
    At the OD, both of our horses were a bit off.  Fancy tore her front 
    right shoe off as we were loading up to leave from home. To show you 
    how aggeeable the vets were, they looked at her and then asked us to 
    present her when the farrier showed up and she could trot out.  On 
    her trot out she was a tad sore, but not enough to hold her from 
    starting the ride.
    It was duly noted on her vet card and she was allowed to do the 
    ride.  As she worked through the day, she just got better.  Each time 
    at the vet check I made sure the vet understood how she looked when 
    she began, and then we compared it to how she was doing.  She went 
    from a B on her gait when she started and finished with an A.
    Here is an example of the team approach working at its best.
    
    Diane's horse began with a B and finished with a B+.  Again we worked 
    with the vets throughout the ride.
    
    
    > Since I was NOT at the OD  - let me ask this one - DID ALL the 
    horses
    > get the CRI done at ALL VC-  AND - at the FINISH - was it used as a
    > finishing criteria? COULD you have been pulled for a 'failed' CRI at
    > the finish??   Need to define that one?
    
    At the OD the vets did notice more gait abberations than usual this 
    year at the vet in.  This is according to Art King the head vet.  In 
    addition he said many of them worked out of what ever was bothering 
    them at the time.  Folks ship in for many miles.  The horses get to 
    stand around for maybe less than a full day and are presented.  Lots 
    of possibilities here for cramping, legs weary from the trailering 
    and so forth.
    ON the CRI, it worked for us all day. 
    
    Two weeks ago I ran my new stallion Mose and his CRI was high or out 
    of whack at the first vet check.  He was all excited. The vet looked 
    at him and said, "Oh, he is just fine, he just needs another 15 miles 
    to settle down."  And she was right.
    At the next vet check he dropped like a rock.
    
    Most of our vets do this vetting month after month.  They look at 
    hundreds of horses.  They have the opportunity to see many, many more 
    cases of gait aberation than we do, and with their team
    attitude they are trying to develop with the riders, I'll still go 
    with their judgement without the addition of any new rules.
    
    We have not ridden a lot this year, but at the rides we have attended 
    I would score the vetting right up there with the very best and I'll 
    include the OD in that group of rides this year.
    Jerry Fruth
    AERC #441
    
    
    =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
     Ridecamp is a service of Endurance Net, http://www.endurance.net.
     Information, Policy, Disclaimer: http://www.endurance.net/Ridecamp
    =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=