Check it Out!
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index] [Subject Index]

Re: RE: Pull codes

Title: RE: Pull codes
I don't think a "metabolic" pull is anything to be ashamed of, nor would it go against the horse's record.  It just shows a smart rider, not a compromised horse.  Any horse can have a bad day, and a smart rider is one who pulls out before the "bad" becomes "worse."  This has been the jinx against using the REAL reason a horse is pulled.  Riders have been concerned that it would look bad on the horse's record.  RO tells vets nothing, unless it is truly a code referring to the rider, who may be tired, injured or ill.  The reason for pull codes is education, not punishment.  How else can vets learn statistics about horses?  If a given ride has a disproportionate number of L pulls or a disproportionate number of M pulls, then it tells the vets something, or the ride management.  Perhaps the ride is unrealistically difficult, or the terrain is too punishing.
  From: Kathy Mayeda
To: ; ;
Sent: Monday, October 08, 2001 8:21 AM
Subject: RC: RE: Pull codes

I got an RO also, for bringing my horse back to the vet after passing the lunch vet check and he wasn’t “quite right”.   I wonder if you took the RO option out of it and a metabolic would go against the horse, that people would continue under these circumstances anyway because they don’t want to have a “metabolic” pull against the horse’s record. 


=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-Ridecamp is a service of Endurance Net, Information, Policy, Disclaimer: =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

    Check it Out!    

Home    Events    Groups    Rider Directory    Market    RideCamp    Stuff

Back to TOC