RE: NORCO BC FROM ONE THAT WAS CONSIDERED

["Kathy Mayeda" <Kathy_Mayeda@atce.com>]

I RO'd a ride and hour and half after vetting in for lunch because Beau just was acting real wierd, and it was real hot without much water on the trail the next loop.  Just as I was walking to the Ride Manager, he peed darker than usual.

 

They ran a CRI on him and his CRI came in 40/44 and they told me that I had made a good call to bring him back to get checked.  (15/16 means 60/64?) One horse got DQ'd at Swanton for having a CRI of 60/60 (15/15) at the after lunch recheck with all other parameters being good.   So if the same vets were vetting here, the horse might have been actually disqualified, let alone not considered for BC.

 

K.

-----Original Message-----
From: KimFue@aol.com [mailto:KimFue@aol.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2001 7:47 PM
To: guest@endurance.net
Subject: RC: NORCO BC FROM ONE THAT WAS CONSIDERED

In a message dated 9/5/01 7:24:01 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
guest@endurance.net writes:

his CRI was a little
elevated at 15/16.  

Do you mean that you had all A's and one B at all checks including your final
exam and you were not considered for BC because of a one point elevated CRI?  
Even if you received - below a 5 in the recovery portion of the BC scoring
and received 9s & 10s, which I am assuming you did, by the way you describe
your scores I cannot imagine why your horse would not be considered for BC.  
It just does not make sense.  If you receive your score sheet back from Lynne
I would be curious to know your individual as well as overall scores.

Kim Fuess