Re: RC: nutrition and what we already know

["Carolyn Burgess" <carolyn_burgess@hotmail.com>]

Which Omolene: 100, 200 or 300?  I feed 100 and haven't noticed anything 
new.

Carolyn Burgess


>From: "Michelle Fink" <michrowe@redwrench.com>
>To: <ridecamp@endurance.net>
>Subject: RC:  nutrition and what we already know
>Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2001 13:17:42 -0700
>MIME-Version: 1.0
>Received: from [207.141.24.22] by hotmail.com (3.2) with ESMTP id 
>MHotMailBC77CB17006AD820F3E3CF8D1816A40C0; Tue Mar 13 12:16:24 2001
>Received: (from slist@localhost)by seahorse.fsr.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id 
>MAA28115;Tue, 13 Mar 2001 12:18:02 -0800 (PST)
>From ridecamp-request@endurance.net Tue Mar 13 12:18:22 2001
>Resent-Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2001 12:18:00 -0800 (PST)
>Old-Return-Path: <michrowe@redwrench.com>
>Message-ID: <002d01c0abfa$aa5d7880$46d32dc7@mr>
>Resent-Message-ID: <qEZ6v.A.A3G.3Bor6@seahorse.fsr.com>
>Resent-From: ridecamp@endurance.net
>Precedence: list
>Resent-Sender: ridecamp-request@endurance.net
>
>Anyone seen the new Omolene?  It's supposedly been re-formulated and is
>being marketed as a "controlled energy" formula.  Looks like they reduced
>molasses, added more fiber (beet pulp?) and added more vegetable oil.  
>Sound
>like what most of us are feeding anyway?
>
>:-) Michelle
>(Colorado)
>
>
>=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
>Ridecamp is a service of Endurance Net, http://www.endurance.net.
>Information, Policy, Disclaimer: http://www.endurance.net/RideCamp
>=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
>

_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com