Re: Re: breeder ethics

["Whitney Bass" <bass@bigsky.net>]

Of course it's more important to have a "high-quality" horse, than a
beautiful one.  But I've found that most high-quality horses ARE beautiful.
 A well put together, athletic horse, generally has a nice, balanced,
beautiful appearance. 
----------
> From: Eenergonzillen@aol.com
> To: truman.prevatt@netsrq.com
> Cc: ridecamp@endurance.net
> Subject: RC:    Re: breeder ethics
> Date: Thursday, February 03, 2000 6:35 PM
> 
> I would, personally, not feel right about selling anyone a poor quality 
> horse.  If the public wanted "tall and black", instead of simply aiming
for 
> tall, black horses, I would aim for GOOD QUALITY tall black horses.  I
think 
> any good horseman/woman would look for a quality horse that could serve a

> purpose for many years before they would look for something that was
pretty 
> and big.  When I go to a ride (usually to volunteer), I find myself
"oohing" 
> and "ahhing" over the best conditioned horse, not the pretty, tall black 
> horse standing in the shade with an IV in it's neck.  
> I'm not saying that pretty black horses are the only horses to get pulled

> from rides, I'm just saying that, to me, it is more important to have a
high 
> quality horse, than a beautiful one.  
> -Renee
> 
> 
> =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
> Ridecamp is a service of Endurance Net, http://www.endurance.net.    
> Information, Policy, Disclaimer: http://www.endurance.net/RideCamp   
> =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=