|     Check it Out!     |
| [Date Prev] | [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] |
| [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Author Index] | [Subject Index] |
<< Ain't confused-what you described above is exactly what I described-Lots of muscle but very little body fat. Sarah >> Then our definition of "greyhound" differs. A greyhound, to me, is a gaunt, sucked up horse, with no belly at all--not necessarily ribs sticking out, but no genuine muscle mass--these get severely muscle sore after races (catabolism), recover very slowly, then then incur a varietyof soft-tissue/coallagen fiber injuries, as well as lung bleeding. Not in a chronic diseased state, as Susan described, but definitely compromised, both in performance and recovery. Our horses bounce right back and are working again the day after the race--much to the astonisment of the trackers--and drug-free--much to the horror of trainers and veterinarians at the track. And they call our horses "fat". If one of these morons claims one of our horses, the first thing he'll do is keep him in the stall for 30 days while he starves 150 pounds off him. If that doesn't happen, then the horse, which will typicallybe worked half the daily volume or less, quickly becomes so unruly with an overabundance of energy, that the riders can't hold him under control. This is your definition of a "greyhound", not mine. ti
|     Check it Out!     |