Check it Out!    
RideCamp@endurance.net
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index] [Subject Index]

Re: Up Hill or Down



Sorry, Tom. This is basic physics. We aren't discussing the cutting edge of
carbohydrates in endurance where research is incomplete. We are talking
elementary mechanics. If you could establish that was bull, you would be
guaranteed a Nobel prize in Physics. The Tivers version of
Michaelson-Morley.

I should also point out (as did David) that all of this is statics. Dynamic
calculations are a lot more complex (but well understood although the math
can be overwhelming - nothing controversial here to physicists, except maybe
the flat earth type).

Duncan Fletcher
dfletche@gte.net

----- Original Message -----
From: <Tivers@aol.com>

> In a message dated 1/10/00 3:41:52 PM Pacific Standard Time, CMKSAGEHIL
> writes:
>
> << << If the horse's back remains level, the center of gravity will not
> change.
>   But bringing the hind legs forward changes the relative load on the fore
and
>   hinds in favor of the hinds. Don't confuse these two. David worked out
the
>   math. But it was not a change in CG, but a change in support location >>
>
>  Bingo.
>
>  Heidi >>
>
> Bull.
>
> ti
>



=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Ridecamp is a service of Endurance Net, http://www.endurance.net.    
Information, Policy, Disclaimer: http://www.endurance.net/RideCamp   
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=



    Check it Out!    

Home    Events    Groups    Rider Directory    Market    RideCamp    Stuff

Back to TOC