Re: RC: First vs. BC

["GESA BRINKS" <gesaeqfx@pe.net>]

Sounds like a good idea to me.          gesa n clovis (does that mean we get
to go faster now?)
-----Original Message-----
From: CMKSAGEHIL@aol.com <CMKSAGEHIL@aol.com>
To: truman.prevatt@netsrq.com <truman.prevatt@netsrq.com>
Cc: hikryrdg@evansville.net <hikryrdg@evansville.net>; Coujurs1@aol.com
<Coujurs1@aol.com>; ribbitttreefrog@yahoo.com <ribbitttreefrog@yahoo.com>;
ridecamp@endurance.net <ridecamp@endurance.net>
Date: Wednesday, November 03, 1999 7:20 PM
Subject: RC: RC: First vs. BC


>In a message dated 11/3/99 6:13:26 PM Pacific Standard Time,
>truman.prevatt@netsrq.com writes:
>
><< Either give one point per pound in the 100 instead fo the 1/2 point or
> give 1/2 point per minute instead of 1. Either would probably even it
> out.  >>
>
>Actually, since the weight factor does not vary, I think the solution is to
>adjust the time factor.  The horse has not carried any more weight per
mile,
>but because the mileage has doubled, the time factor is exaggerated.
>
>Heidi
>
>
>=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
>Ridecamp is a service of Endurance Net, http://www.endurance.net.
>Information, Policy, Disclaimer: http://www.endurance.net/RideCamp
>=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
>


=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Ridecamp is a service of Endurance Net, http://www.endurance.net.    
Information, Policy, Disclaimer: http://www.endurance.net/RideCamp   
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=