Check it Out!
Re: RE: Buying a horse/WARNING
I guess in this particular case, there is some confusion because the person
who obtained the pre-purchase was not allowed to buy the horse and the
person who actually bought the horse got the pre-purchase information from
the vet just by asking for it. So, in this case at least, "buyer" is a
relative term. Does seem like the person who benefitted from the
information (the person who went home with the horse) might have some
liability for the vet bill, although I suppose it could also be argued that
since the vet should not have released the information to anyone other than
the person who ordered the pre-purchase, the vet might have to eat it. I
don't know any of these folks--my interest is purely academic. Be
interesting to know what the attorneys on Ridecamp say.
----- Original Message -----
To: <Dbeverly4@aol.com>; <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Sent: Wednesday, October 13, 1999 10:06 AM
Subject: RC: RE: Buying a horse/WARNING
> In a message dated 10/13/99 12:11:39 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
> Dbeverly4@aol.com writes:
> << So, who gets stuck with the vet bill? >>
> The buyer. I either state up front whether or not an exam is included.
> it's not, the buyer has the right to have one done, but at their cost.
> unusual for a seller to pay for a pre-purchase exam. I usually do if the
> seller would like, but that is not something that is normally done.
> Ridecamp is a service of Endurance Net, http://www.endurance.net.
> Information, Policy, Disclaimer: http://www.endurance.net/RideCamp
Ridecamp is a service of Endurance Net, http://www.endurance.net.
Information, Policy, Disclaimer: http://www.endurance.net/RideCamp
Check it Out!
Back to TOC