Check it Out!    
RideCamp@endurance.net
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index] [Subject Index]

Re: RC: LD definition



On Mon, 27 Sep 1999 18:16:20 -0500, "Becky Huffman" <TOS@htcomp.net>
wrote:

>I didn't understand that the rules changes would be temporary.  The 0-49
>was voted in.  Issues were addressed, workable solutions were found and
>implemented.  Then, after the fact, the petition was circulated, forcing
>another vote, which is the one coming up.  

0 - 49 was voted in without sufficient discussion and consideration of
the consquences, and was a classic case of "fixing something that
wasn't broke" and ending up with unintended consequences.  I do not
agree that the temporary solutions are workable; they are at best
workarounds, kludges.  Plans for the petition began immediately upon
release of the vote count on the change.

IMO the whole thing was a mistake and a boondoggle from the beginning.

-- 

Joe Long
jlong@mti.net
http://www.mti.net     Business
http://www.rnbw.com    Personal


=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Ridecamp is a service of Endurance Net, http://www.endurance.net.    
Information, Policy, Disclaimer: http://www.endurance.net/RideCamp   
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=



    Check it Out!    

Home    Events    Groups    Rider Directory    Market    RideCamp    Stuff

Back to TOC