Re: Unidentified subject!

["April" <adlee@bigfoot.com>]

Was this directed at me?  I don't know because I've missed some e-mails, but
I'll answer it anyway.  It's not only them pointing something out.  It's
also a case of them missing something.  I just feel more comfortable having
a vet look at my horse because I have no way of knowing how experienced
"experienced" means.

If I know the rider and know their background and experiences and I trust
them, I'd be more likely to go through their "line," but if you open up vet
checks to experienced riders, there might be a problem of control.  At least
with a vet, they have to have a degree, right?

Besides, if my horse goes into a vet check....he should get checked by a
vet.  And if there is only one vet and 2 or 3 "experienced" riders checking
horses?  I'd stand in line for the vet.

April & Apache
AERC #M20813
Chattanooga, TN

"If I were a little, little [wo]man,
  I would ride squirrels."

----- Original Message -----
From: Kim Najera <horseypoop@hotmail.com>


Why can't an experienced endurance rider point something out and have a vet
confirm it ?


=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Ridecamp is a service of Endurance Net, http://www.endurance.net.    
Information, Policy, Disclaimer: http://www.endurance.net/RideCamp   
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=