Check it Out!
[Date Prev]  [Date Next]
[Thread Prev]  [Thread Next]  [Date Index]  [Thread Index]  [Author Index]  [Subject Index]
Re: MECHANICAL FATIGUE
>The 3 day 100 is a good test - a good way to bring a horse along. But I
>fear that is not the case for the shorter CTR these days. I think the
>horses have become better than the test in a 25 mile CTR. I think the
>conditioning methods used for endurance - selective use of speed for
>anarobic conditioning along with LSD has is producing animals that can tick
>off a 25 with no sweat.
I think this is true, to a significant extent. Over 10 years of judging
ECTRA CTRs, I have seen a trend towards scores closer and closer to
perfect--just a point off here and there. It has gotten so I feel relieved
to be judging a 2 day, because I have some hope that at least *some* of
those suckers will be tired at the end <G>.
>What critera does one use for placement when all the horses at 48/48 at the
>10 minute CRI and all the metabolic parameters are "A". This is the case
>for most SE CTR's. I fear that what is happening is the 25 mile CTR is
>becoming a horse show where beauty of movement is replacing condition as
This is less true, IME. I don't reward "beauty" of movement so much as
>I see the judges becoming so picky in order to get placements that it is
>turnig people off. I see judges hiding in the brush and horses spooking
>and losing points because they spooked at something in the brush moving.
Thank goodness I don't have to do that under ECTRA rules. Just condtition.
Back to TOC