ridecamp@endurance.net: Re: Need help with list problems again...

Re: Need help with list problems again...

Karen Steenhof (steenhof@cyberhighway.net)
Sat, 20 Dec 1997 09:37:54 -0700

Add me to the list of people who got this last time I posted anything.
Karen Steenhof
Boise, Idaho
steenhof@cyberhighway.net

----------
> From: Lauren Horn <fourhorn@fea.net>
> To: SSY <polstar@hutchtel.net>
> Cc: ridecamp@endurance.net
> Subject: Re: Need help with list problems again...
> Date: Saturday, December 20, 1997 8:40 AM
>
> SSY wrote:
> >
> > Hi List Keeper or any body
> >
> > Do you know why I get this when I send an e-mail to ride camp?
>
>
> I just started getting that message too! The last few posts (I think it
> started when I replyed about Truman's filly) this message has come to
> me. Where does the problem lie, Steph?
> >
> > >From: Administrator@obgyn-po.obgyn.uiowa.edu
> > >Date: Sat, 20 Dec 1997 06:56:08 -0600
> > >
> > >Not deliverable to: HimmelreichL
> > >Received: by pink-floyd.uiowa.edu (cc:Mail translation to SMTP)
> > > on Sat Dec 20 06:53:00 1997
> > >From: Administrator@obgyn-po.obgyn.uiowa.edu
> > >To: SSY <polstar@hutchtel.net>
> > >Date: Sat, 20 Dec 97 06:52 CST
> > >Subject: Message not deliverable
> > >MIME-Version: 1.0
> > >Content-Type: MULTIPART/MIXED;
> > > boundary="-boundary:=567067980-8365=:boundary"
> > >Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT
> > >
> > >This is the preamble of a multipart message.
> > >Mail readers that understand multipart format should
> > >ignore this preamble. If you are reading this text,
> > >you might want to consider changing to a mail reader
> > >that understands how to properly display multipart messages.
> > >
> > >---boundary:=567067980-8365=:boundary
> > >Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
> > >Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT
> > >
> > >----------------------------------- Returned
> > >-----------------------------------
> > >From: SSY <polstar@hutchtel.net> at internet
> > >Date: 12/20/97 6:19AM
> > >To: HimmelreichL at obgyn-po
> > >*To: ridecamp@endurance.net at internet
> > >Subject: Re: Q re Sports Saddle
> >
>---------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
> > >
> > >---boundary:=567067980-8365=:boundary
> > >Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
> > >Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT
> > >
> > >Resent-Date: Sat, 20 Dec 1997 04:23:06 -0800 (PST)
> > >In-Reply-To:
> > > <Pine.LNX.3.91.971219202331.12949B-100000@consider.theneteffect.com>
> > >Resent-Message-ID: <"Y5MiQ3.0.D84.ZQxcq"@starfish>
> > >Resent-From: ridecamp@endurance.net
> > >X-Mailing-List: <ridecamp@endurance.net> archive/latest/4685
> > >X-Loop: ridecamp@endurance.net
> > >Precedence: list
> > >Resent-Sender: ridecamp-request@endurance.net
> >
>---------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
> > >-
> > >Dear Glenda and Lakota
> > >
> > >Check the IBM Patent search or US Patent over the internet. (Sports
Saddle
> > >or Bob Marshal (sp) It will give you a clear picture of how the
saddle was
> > >designed. I did this before buying a couple of them. Believe there
have
> > >been improvements since the patent? It is still good art work..
> > >Need help let me know...................
> > >
> > >Sigrid
> > >
> > >The Space Cadet
> > >
> >
>***************************************************************************
****
> > >*
> > >*
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >>The talk of standing in the stirrups of an OF saddle, and the
> > >>possibility that it causes problems <bg>, reminded me of a question
I've
> > >>had in mind recently with respect to the Sports Saddle.
> > >>
> > >>With no true tree in the saddle (if I understand correctly), the
stirrups
> > >>are somehow attached to the middle part of the saddle, which is soft
> > >>padding. (I've been reading the websites.) Knowing that endurance
riders
> > >>spend many hours standing up, with some or all of the rider's weight
on
> > >>the stirrups, in varying degrees, for hours and hours ... how does
the
> > >>weight distribution vary with a SS as opposed to a normal saddle with
> > >>tree? It is my understanding, from previous posts on this list, that
> > >>standing in the stirrups distributes the rider's weight across the
entire
> > >>tree, thus on a broader portion of the horse's back. So, on a
treeless
> > >>saddle, how is the weight distributed across the horse's back when
the
> > >>rider is standing in the stirrups? Would standing in the stirrups a
lot
> > >>reduce the longevity of this saddle?
> > >>
> > >>Curious as always :)
> > >>
> > >>Glenda & Lakota
> > >
> > >---boundary:=567067980-8365=:boundary--
> > >
>

Home Events Groups Rider Directory Market RideCamp Stuff