Re: low heel, high heel

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
• Next message: Connie Hoge: "RE: underwear"
• Previous message: Tivers@aol.com: "Re: Fw: Tom Ivers -- "The Inside Track" -- Trail Blazer Article"
• Maybe in reply to: Roberta Lieberman: "low heel, high heel"
• Next in thread: Tivers@aol.com: "Re: low heel, high heel"

<< I believe that this is also the theory that Tony Gonzolas (sp?) proposed
in
Total Balanced Motion. I have also heard Deb Bennett's theory on this and
it does make some sense. In many cases the lower heeled hoof is also
larger which implies more weight which would validate the theory of leaning
on that leg.

Truman
>>

Also in racehorses. Smaller, steeper foot on the "sore" leg.

ti

------------------------------

• Next message: Connie Hoge: "RE: underwear"
• Previous message: Tivers@aol.com: "Re: Fw: Tom Ivers -- "The Inside Track" -- Trail Blazer Article"
• Maybe in reply to: Roberta Lieberman: "low heel, high heel"
• Next in thread: Tivers@aol.com: "Re: low heel, high heel"

Home Events Groups Rider Directory Market RideCamp Stuff