Re: Drugs/rules--"intangible" nutrients

Truman Prevatt (truman.prevatt@netsrq.com)
Wed, 11 Dec 1996 13:49:48 -0400

Linda,

Sorry if I misinterperated your post.

>
>I was not referring specifically to MSM and DMG, however, those are good
>examples of supplements we don't know everything about. To wit, our past
>posts from Susan Evans, RE -- DMG. (And if Susan's research is correct,
>DMG is a nutritional supplement which would have not effect outside that 72
>hour window).
>
>What I've tried to convey here is, we are asking the horse to do work for
>us that will cause his body harm without proper nutrition. We, in turn,
>should do whatever is possible to prevent harm to the horse.
>

Agree! But in our zeal to prevent harm we should take care not to mask
something from ourselves, the vets or worse yet the horse that will result
in real harm.

This drug issue is a real "Pandora's box". Let me throw something out.
Assume that MSM has all the anti-inflammatory properties that are claimed
by the producers. Then why allow MSM and not allow low levels of bute, or
a better yet a glucocorticoid. Glucocorticolds are a substance produced
by the body (the adrenal cortex to be exact) and are present (naturally
occureing) so why shouldn't you be able to legally use dexamethasone? If I
am correct, dex has no effect after 48 hours. Where do you draw the line?

Truman

>
>Linda Van Ceylon
>lvanceylon@vines.colostate.edu

Truman Prevatt
Sarasota, FL