Re: Letter to AERC

Susan F. Evans (suendavid@worldnet.att.net)
(no date)

Linda VanCeylon wrote:
>
> The letter to AERC sounds great, Susan. You have my permission to
> reproduce anything I've posted.
>
> We might want to put a summary page in that states the number opposed to
> cash prizes and the number for. And maybe a one-liner for the major
> reasons.
>
> I've been told that when some of the directors get a "big bundle" of
> information in a letter, they just skim through it. If we want to submit
> our argument in the best way we probably should make it as easy as possible
> for them to get the point.
>
> Linda Van Ceylon
> lvanceylon@vines.colostate.edu

This is a good point. When I've gotten all the posts together, I'll do
a brief summary. Should be easy to do, since the bottom line is that we
all seem to feel we don't want to rebuff Nutramax or other corporate
sponsors, we're just concerned about the implications, and would like to
raise the suggestions of other uses than a cash prizes for first to
finish. Also, I was planning on highlighting the "bottom line" on each
post, as many include previous posts, etc.

There have been a few posts with slightly different points of view and I
will make note of those, also.

Thanks,

Susan Evans

--
|Fidonet:  "Susan F. Evans"  2:234/49.99
|Internet: "Susan.F..Evans".@234-49-99.swimsuit.roskildebc.dk
| NOTE: For fast delivery use this adress, not a -.z2.fidonet.org-
|       adress!
| NOTE: You may now use ÆØÅæøå, either ISO8859-1 or quoted-printable
|       when replying to this message!
|
| Standard disclaimer: The views of this user are strictly his own.