ridecamp@endurance.net: Re: [endurance] wolf teeth vs. canine teeth; bit placement

Re: [endurance] wolf teeth vs. canine teeth; bit placement

pamela (PAM@rpsi.com)
Mon, 22 Apr 1996 10:01:32 -0400

I was unaware that anybody deliberately taught their horse to be behind
the bit, although a multitude of "English" horses (top level dressage
horses come to mind) are indeed behind the bit--also called overbent.

I don't know much about curb bits either, but I read a post from Jessica
Jahiel's mail list where she specifically stated that western horses are
trained to be behind the bit.

Also, physically, a horse doesn't need to be overbent to be behind the
bit... that's exactly my point. That is, if the bit sits low in the mouth then
reins without tension in them (like the manner in which western reined
horses are taught) will allow the horse to move behind the bit.

> You may be confusing English/Western with Snaffle/Curb bit

Yes, yours is the contrast I intended: snaffle vs. curb bitting.

The quote I gave from Podhajski was for the placement of the snaffle. I
can also tell you where he says to put the curb if you would like.

Please do. I've been wondering about this topic for a while. The question
came up for me as I started to ponder why so many people were resorting
to Kimblewick bits for trail riding.

Pam.